At best W&W are disingenuous
At best W&W are disingenuous, at worst they are deliberately misleading, by with-holding known information to induce a sale. This is by their own admission; it is not opinion.
I won two lots of vinyl records; by and large, garbage. Dirty, scratched, water damaged, covers are torn, seams are split, sleeves are ripped, and the odd one is even empty. When I enquired, I was told “All vinyl is checked through and all quality LPs are removed”, so they knew that what I was bidding on was garbage and decided not to say. I was then told that it was “due to the volume of lots we have”, but it doesn’t stack up when they reviewed the vinyl and removed the “quality” ones. Even if that excuse held water, it is not my responsibility to ensure they can handle their workload. I was also advised that I should have requested a condition report. That may be technically correct per their terms, however, I have bought hundreds of records from reputable auction houses and all were fantastic quality. And remember, W&W admit they knew what they were selling was rubbish, but omitted to say so. I shouldn’t have needed a condition report, if they were either selling merchantable quality goods or being transparent with the facts.
The vast majority of the collections are stuff charity shops would struggle to give away; classical, Slim Whitman, Charley Pride, James Last, etc. Of the ones name-checked in their description, all were scratched and damaged except one. And they were not representative of the collection.
Yes, it was something of a punt. No, I did not expect everything to be perfect. No, I did not expect everything to be Thriller or Back In Black. But nor do I expect to be someone else’s skip and to have to pay for that pleasure!
4 December 2024
Unprompted review