Daily Mail Reviews 

The only value the DM knows is hate. No fact checking, editorials by fired or senile ex mps. Will flip flop on any subject. Remember this rag supported Hitler, wanted to ban the kinder boats and now is Israel s biggest fan. Excrement in paper form

Almost as bad as the msn feed.. Very VERY few of their articles are worth reading but the worst part is the hateful comments section with comments that nobody ever reports nor do they ever get taken down. I'm convinced the daily mail website is managed by AI and bots

Constantly begging for money and blocking stories.
It has become this bad that i have switched to other news.

Mail has declined in content value within the past six months. Also went to subscription yet is easy enough to get around by archiving articles. Youy'll be banned if you post too many comments it doesn't agree with or you question the quality of the content. It also does a lot of celeb advertising without using a disclaimer therby misleading readers.

Daily Mail blocked my IP address because of this comment:
" Funny how wars are started in countries the Rothschild´s don't control the national bank in. In the year 2000 the list was: Afghanistan, Cuba, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria. This is obviously just a coincidence and conspiracy" I forgot to add Iran to the list too.

I took out a Daily Mail print edition subscription a couple of months ago which sends you pre-paid vouchers for money off at your local Newsagent. Then I found out that you can't cancel any of the pre-paid vouchers whilst you are away on holiday and as I had at least 4 weeks of holidays booked up ahead I hardly saved any money plus I had the hassle of having to use vouchers in the shop instead of me just calling them and paying my bill monthly. So I decided to cancel my subscription. It would have been easier to steal the Crown Jewels than find out how to cancel. You can't do it on line they insist you telephone, then you wait for someone to answer, then they give you the third degree about cancelling etc. The whole experience with the Daily Mail subscription service has been awful. If I pay for a subscription I should be able to Cancel it easily but not with this lot. SO, beware if you are thinking about subscribing to the Daily Mail.

I really hate companies that lead you on to pay fees
The daily mail is always showing headlines with links that lead you to the page with the headline but it is blocked if you do not subscribe,
I am not asking to be allowed to see all their stories just that they should not lead you to something they have no intention of letting you see,
I would and have never paid any thing to any company that feels it is ok to use these tactics,
Shame on you Daily Mail !

I only read it for one particular columnist.

The first month's subscription is free. Thereafter for twelve months it's £1.99 p/m. Okay, sure I can pay that just for one column.

Then after twelve months, it's hiked to £6.99. I mean c'mon, Daily Mail. I know you need to make money to survive, but what makes to think that people want to read all or even most content from your 'paper' or online site?

That one column takes me about a minute to read every Sunday. I would be begrudgingly pay £1.99 per month for this (so 50p per column). But there is no way I'm going to pay anything above that, let alone £6.99 p/m, which won't be an indefinitely static subscription charge.

Here's an idea, why don't you have different premiums/monthly tarffis that allow subscribers to pick how much content they can read? Because you're never going to see a penny from me unless that becomes an option.

Lastly, and this is no small point. The comments section used to be great until maybe three months ago. Now it doesn't work properly, and the censorship for even benign, middle of the road, innocuous and expletive free comments is enough to probably make Kim Jong Un blush. Why should I pay to subscribe to read what someone else thinks but not have the freedom of expression to comment?

I have read the Daily Mail for many years and mostly enjoyed it. Not now, I'm afraid. After a succession of 'Anonymous' stories I can't bear anymore. Who are these people supposedly telling their tales? No one should be anonymous, apart from rape victims. Where's the transparency? Lately there has been blanket coverage of Brooklyn Beckham. Today there's a double-page spread in the paper. What has Brooklyn done to earn this, um, nothing. His mother doesn't get on with his wife. Who cares? Katie Hind's articles are dull, dull, dull, almost as dull as Brooklyn. I can't carry on buying this overpriced rubbish. I'm sad because I enjoy the cryptic crossword but it's not worth the anger that the nonsense passing as news causes. The paper has shrunk in size and we are charged more to buy it. What a farce.

They employ idiot writers who can’t even spell in English. Low class newspaper. Waste

DailyMail has become a celebrity rag. Unintresting stories about societies lowest class of individules. No one cares about morally bankrupt celebrities any more. Where are the hard hitting articles about the mess going on in the UK and around the world? All human interests stories are locked behind a pay wall. They can keep their drivel and I'll keep my money.

Appalling rag written by work experience hacks who can’t spell, use correct grammar or know how to proof read. The articles are garbage. If someone doesn’t like your comment they will complain until you’re banned from the site, even though the person who complained is a serial commenter with a hundred aliases. But MOL could care about that. I’ve deleted the app and I’m so relieved to be done with this crap of a news site.

When I bought the Daily Mail newspaper it was quite a serious paper. Now it's just gossip, articles repeated from years ago, or copied from the Sun, or social media. The standard of English is diabolical. Not only that but leaving a comment also doesn't work. Replying to someone doesn't land on their comment, or you can't leave a message at all. Even filling in a complaint form doesn't work! Yet they want us to pay for this!

This rag needs to be held to account and has been allowed to print negative media, comments, twisted on all levels. Avoid! Far more trustworthy media out there. The world isn't as bad as they are making it out to be for their own revenue gain while their billionaire owner hides in the shadows from the public limelight. Really bad! AVOID!

BIGGEST SHAREHOLDER OF PA MEDIA GROUP LTD

PA MEDIA GROUP OWNERS OF ALAMY

ALAMY use PicRights, Visual Rights Group, Copyright Agent and Pixray Fair Licensing to check if uses of an images online have permission or a license in place.

THEY ARE IN BED WITH PICRIGHTS to EXTORT money from small businesses who accidentally use these images.

New app is absolute rubbish.

Daily mail wipe any comments related to Prince Andrew or the royal family.
Daily mail like the Royal Family now have Blood on their hands Andrew’s Australian Victim has committed suicide

I have been a regular reader of the Mail on Line for years in good times and bad. However it has reached a point where I cannot tolerate it any longer. It is just a fascist Trump supporting celeb rag for infants and the intellectually challenged with an abysmal standard of reporting and articles. In addition it is so stuffed with ads even on a PC with fibre broadband it is barely even usable. I have no intention of wasting any more of my time on it.

The D.M is absolute garbage. Most of the so called news items are pure and simple gutter press. It really should have a minus zero star rating. RUBBISH

its just a celebrity rag now. Full of trivia and tittle tattle. It defies the law of honesty calling itself a newspaper these days. Its mostly American articles or American celeb articles and sex articles.