even the platform has a lot of bugs,but it is indeed a good freelance platform which I earned salary from it
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
Created with AI, based on recent reviews
The world's leading AI companies rely on Outlier data to push the frontiers of artificial intelligence. Our contributors provide their expertise across a range of disciplines, from coding, math, and hard sciences to writing in languages from around the world. Remote work with Outlier offers hands-on experience in the world's fastest growing industry, fair pay, and the freedom to set your own hours.
United States
Asks customers to review
This company invites their customers to review, whether positive or negative
At Trustpilot, it's all about human content. This business can also access our AI-assisted response tool which helps them draft replies.
How this company uses Trustpilot
See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.
Great work experience as an AI model evaluator. The work is serious and requires preparation and expertise, but it's also well-paid. It's great to be part of a team spread across the globe.
What I like is that I own my time, there are enough tasks for everyone, and training and learning materials are readily available. What I don't like is how the system and payout process works. You're paid only after a week or two, depending on whether someone in a higher-ranking position reviews your work. If they don't review it, you don't get paid. The issue is that these reviewers act as your QA, but the results are often very late, to the point that you can't contest them since the review deadline has passed. You then have to go through your entire history to check which tasks are marked with low accuracy, which affects your tier, payout, and eligibility for more tasks. It would be better if they had an efficient system to review tasks promptly so you have proper expectations on when they will review it and whether it will be paid out. Currently, I have around 150+ pending tasks that haven't been paid out yet because they haven't been reviewed. This work isn't suitable for anyone looking to finance their lifestyle; it's just a side job you can do at any time. Nevertheless, I'm grateful for the opportunity and look forward to better service.
I'm really enjoying working with Outlier. This is my first time doing this kind of work, and I feel lucky to have found them, they truly opened that first door for me. The support team is always there to connect us with the project clients, and whenever an issue comes up, it's sorted out the very same day. I also love being part of the community, and the webinars have been great for helping me sharpen my skills on my current project, Aether.
To be honest, at first I was a little skeptical about the plataform. I thought it might be some kind of scam. However, I've now been submitting tasks for three months and so far I haven't had any significant problems. Payments are made without fail, and the workflow has remained quite satisfactory, with only occasional EQ lasting a few days. I recommend the plataform to anyone looking for extra income.
I've been working on it for the past few months and haven't had any payment issues. Also, the support (which is human, not AI unlike what others say) is readily available to resolve any issues, and I've always had a good experience with them.
I think the point is that, being an "online job," many people may not take it seriously and end up being kicked out "without any explanation," as many say.
Furthermore, Outlier offers various forums and groups where you can get help and project clarification. Moreover, unlike other platforms I've applied to, it has been the most stable one and accepted me right away after some skill assessements.
So, speaking entirely from my own experience I highly recommend the platform.
Greatful to Outlier for all the opportunities. It is really a genuine platform. It paid contributors every week as per the timer and you have to maintain the quality of the tasks.
Outlier is a legitimate platform and a great option for someone looking to work on various projects. AI is impacting our lives in every aspect, and the most interesting part is that even a beginner with no AI knowledge can earn by contributing through small projects on Outlier. Outlier has a great community where others will answer your queries, and you can attend the webinars to clarify your doubts. They pay on time every week, and you will not be deceived. That's a guarantee.
There are some issues related to client reviews, which Outlier is trying its best to address, and with time, there will be more projects that will cater to a wide range of professionals and newcomers.
Outlier.AI is the company where I currently work on AI training. It is a fair and transparent organization, with timely payments and a steady stream of work opportunities.
I recommend that everyone get to know this company, whether as partners or as contributors.
A beautiful collaborative platform for contributors and Ai trainers with good community support
Rita
Reached my 100th task milestone — A legitimate and rewarding platform for AI contributors
The platform is easy to navigate with tasks easy to handle. Payments are processed with ease thus convenient. Task availability is however limited. My overall experience has been awesome.
I have been using Outlier for several months and initially appreciated the flexibility and variety of tasks. However, my recent experience has been frustrating and has left me unable to work despite being qualified.
I was removed from a German-language project because my German fluency was not sufficient for that language track. I fully respected that decision.
Shortly after, I was invited to the English-language version of the same project, successfully passed the screening, and was ready to start. However, I remained blocked from accessing it. The old restriction from the German version appeared to be incorrectly applying to the English version.
I contacted support multiple times. The responses were polite but generic – they did not address the specific technical issue I described. I was directed to post in the community forum, which I did, but that did not lead to a resolution. After about a week of waiting, my account was placed in review even though I had not been tasking.
I was then asked to retake a multilingual exam under stressful conditions, and because of the unresolved situation, I was unable to pass it. This has prevented me from working and has been disheartening.
My issue is a technical one, not a qualification one. I am simply asking for a proper review of my account so I can return to work on the project I qualified for. I also hope support responses can become more specific and effective in the future.
i was happy working with outlier because is providing me opportunities to I am very happy working with Outlier; they provide good opportunities for work and professional growth. The selection process was quite pleasant and straightforward. As for improvements, I would simply like more open communication; only one of my referrals has made it through, while the others remain stuck in the process without us knowing why. Otherwise, the company's performance is excellent.
My experience with Outlier has been excellent. The platform is well-organized, the tasks are engaging and clear, and the support team is always helpful and responsive. I have learned a lot while working on projects like Aether. I truly enjoy being part of this community and highly recommend it.
The notable points I experienced working with Outlier:
1. Transparency on job assignment, execution workflow and payment.
2. Logical Screening process before assigning any task.
3. Continuous evaluation to maintain optimum standard.
4. Client oriented approach on availability of experts for particular tasks.
5. Timely payment.
6. Well structured community for instant help/support and open discussions on issues related to tasks for experts.
It has been a very good experience working with Outlier; there is support available through several channels, webinars, and written material to learn from to do the work right and improve. Payments are timely and esy to know what you have earned, and the dashboard and tools are simple, well designed, and easy to use.
Outlier is a great platform for those seeking extra income from home. Projects are coming, maybe not all the time, but they are quite consistent and well paid. At first, it might be frustrating because you spend time onboarding, but once you reach the expected quality in your work, things get much easier.
People working at Outlier are professional, eager to help, and guide you through each project.
I've had a positive experience contributing on Outlier. The platform provides good opportunities to work on AI related projects while working flexibly. I appreciate the variety of task and the opportunity to improve my skills through feedback and quality reviews. Overall, my experience so far has been rewarding, and reaching my 100th task has been great milestone.
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.