The FP Application on-line Electronic…
The FP Application on-line Electronic Service does not recognise personal information such as Address / DOB that are clearly marked on Govt-send letters / Docs that are uploaded to the site.
It means that when the Applicant has to send further personal information (with all personal security risks this entails), they are instructed to send these official letters / Docs to a different on-line site. However, unlike the first time personal Docs are sent, there is no acknowledgement of these second lot of official Govt. letters / Docs via a response e-mail, to the applicant which leaves the applicant wondering if they have been received by the correct Dept. and a worry that their personal ID and details such as Passport or Driving Licence information will get into criminal hands?
To get through on the phone, it takes ages to receive a response. When we got through, the woman named Maria, first told us that there was no date on the official letters / Docs when there clearly was. Then, she said that we hadn't sent them at all, which begs the question of how she would know that a date was missing from the letter / Doc? Then, she said that the letters / Docs had not been received and that we needed to upload all the information again.
Since an e-mail in the form of an acknowledgment had been received after the original Application had been made, (that stated that the Application was complete and all requested information had been received), why would she say that it had not been received? Then, she said that she had no access to e-mails and so she could not view the letter / Docs at her end and that her colleagues only, could view them and to wait a few days for an e-mail to be sent to us. She seemed to repeating from a learnt script and was contradicting what we told her, as if she had not understood what we told her initially? Her English was not very good. After contradicting herself a few times, she then got stroppy, telling us that she would put the phone down, when we were being polite, merely trying to get the correct information which she clearly did not have. It seemed as if she was making it up as she went along and contradicted herself in the process.
It was a complete waste of our time of waiting on the line for a long time.
Some of the staff need proper training because they clearly do not understand plain English or do not understand the job they are employed to do.
10 May 2024
Unprompted review