Essentialcoffee Reviews 1

TrustScore 3 out of 5

3.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

3.2

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

1 review

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Not to be trusted..

Not to be trusted... Essential Coffee’s CEO Todd Hiscock and his shareholder entities were found guilty of shareholder oppression in the Federal Court of Australia. The Court found that "Mr Hiscock could not be accepted as a reliable witness or a witness of truth".

In a scathing trial judgement the Federal Court made adverse credit findings against directors of Essential Coffee's holding company, Essential Investments Pty Ltd. It found that Todd Hiscock and James Cook had deliberately misled shareholders by knowingly providing them with false information. The trial judgement is publicly available on the Federal Court website: Jolan Pty Ltd v Essential Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1533

In the costs judgement, the Federal Court took the rare step of ordering Essential Investments to pay the oppressed shareholder’s legal costs on the indemnity basis, due to the defendants’ unreasonable conduct of the proceedings and the making of allegations by the defendants that ought not to have been made. The costs judgement is publicly available on the Federal Court website: Jolan Pty Ltd v Essential Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 1627

Essential Investments was ordered to buy back its largest shareholder’s 1 million shares for $1.16 per share ($1.16 million), despite arguing that the shares were worth as little as $0.58 per share. The shares were purchased by a group of new and existing shareholders for the price ordered by the Court in order to save the company from being wound up. Essential Investments was then ordered to pay 90% of the oppressed shareholder’s legal costs (which exceeded $1.1 million), in addition to its own legal costs. In the same month, Essential Investments triggered an emergency $500,000 capital raise, selling shares for just $0.76 per share.

7 December 2025
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look