Paying money for being manipulated
Many fake profiles, many old profiles of women who are not active but the site still keep them to use as advertisement and auto-generate messages using these profiles, but actually these real women do not visit the site anymore. The site auto-generates a lot of fake messages which do not come from women themselves. Men think that these women are being interested in them. Many profiles are not updated and do not contain enough info about the women. Many profiles come only with one photo with very few information about the woman, who is not aware even that the site took her photo somewhere and put it on the site... It seems like a human agent is sitting there writing the whole day messages to men, something general like "hello" or "hello from Russia" but never a personal addressed message...but these women never write back when men answer their messages.
The site in whole looks very old fashioned, didn't renew itself for many years but keeps the same style with many old profiles.
The worst of all that is that many young women try to use the site to ask for money after one day of chat on personal messenger.
The site has no authenticity test engine for profiles, nor for men neither for women.
It's humiliating, frustrating to know that you pay money while for women all is free - which makes parasitic women come in easily- and at the end you recognize that you were manipulated!!!
Profiles lack of elementary basic information about women, which makes you feel these profiles were put inside in a hurry just to fulfill the site with as many as possible profiles...only but fake ones.
When you try to report some users because of scams/ fraud or money issue, the site still keep them and takes NO action.
Unfortunately, the response from the site contains several inaccurate statements and avoids addressing the core issues raised in my review. I would like to clarify a few factual points:
1. My review is not about age preference, but about systemic issues: fake or inactive profiles, auto-generated messages, lack of profile verification, and tolerance of scam behaviors. None of these points were addressed in the company’s reply.
2. The company claims to have “very strict scammer control”, yet I personally reported profiles asking for money after very short interactions. Those profiles remained active, and no visible action was taken. This directly contradicts their statement.
3. The assertion that messages come from “very real women” is misleading. Many profiles I interacted with had not logged in for a long time, yet messages were still being generated, which strongly suggests automated or agent-driven messaging rather than genuine user interaction.
4. Numerous profiles lack basic information (biography, updated photos, activity status). Some contain only one photo and no meaningful details. This creates the impression of profiles added in bulk to inflate the platform, rather than genuine, active users.
5. Instead of addressing these concerns, the company chose to make personal assumptions, use derogatory language, and draw irrelevant comparisons (such as nightclubs), which is neither professional nor appropriate for a paid online service.
6. Offering a “free month upgrade” does not resolve the underlying problems of transparency, authenticity, and user protection. In addition, I no longer appear in their database, so I am not returning to the platform — meaning any claim that they “recognize” me is factually impossible.
7. Most importantly, the company’s description of my alleged behavior is entirely false. I am not the person they describe. I did not exclusively contact women in their 20s, I did not ignore messages from women in their 40s, I did not “copy-paste” messages, and I did not behave in the manner they claim. These statements do not correspond to my activity and appear to be either careless assumptions or a confusion with another user. This raises serious concerns about how accurately the platform tracks, reviews, or even understands user activity before making public accusations.
8. To clarify further, I did not receive “many many messages” as the company claims, and I have never “trashed” any messages — everything stays in my inbox. I have noticed that when users have no credits, the site appears to send many messages to create the impression of interest, but once credits are purchased, these messages largely stop, with occasional messages dropped to maintain user engagement. Comparing this to a nightclub is irrelevant and misrepresents the situation. Additionally, I did not contact girls in their 20s, and I am not in my 50s as they stated — I am ten years younger. These repeated inaccuracies further highlight the unreliability of the company’s statements about user activity.

Reply from Artem bazykin







